Trump storms out of courtroom during closing arguments in E. Jean Carroll’s defamation damages trial

Olu Ojo
Advertiser Disclosure

Hey there! We just wanted to let you know that some of the links on this site are affiliate links. That means we may get a commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. You can read our affiliate disclosure in our privacy policy. Don't worry, though - we only recommend products that we personally use and love, and we promise to drink all the coffee from the money we make from affiliate sales. Thanks for your support, and we hope you find our content helpful! Read our disclosure.

In a landmark legal battle that has gripped the nation, E. Jean Carroll, a renowned writer, is seeking substantial damages from former President Donald Trump for defaming her after she accused him of sexual assault in the 1990s. The case, unfolding in the United States District Court, has been marked by dramatic moments and pivotal legal arguments that could set significant precedents in the realms of defamation and presidential immunity.

A Tumultuous Day in Court

Trump’s Abrupt Departure

The trial reached a fever pitch when Trump, known for his unpredictable demeanor, unexpectedly exited the courtroom during closing arguments. The dramatic moment occurred as Carroll’s attorney, Roberta Kaplan, was addressing the jury, accusing the former president of being a habitual liar who believes “the rules don’t apply to him.” U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan (no relation to Roberta Kaplan) noted the departure for the record, highlighting the tension-filled atmosphere.

Carroll’s Allegations and Trump’s Denials

Carroll, in her lawsuit, alleges that Trump sexually assaulted her in a New York department store in the 1990s. Trump has vehemently denied these accusations, dismissing them as a “con job” and attacking Carroll’s credibility. These denials and derogatory remarks form the crux of the defamation suit, with Carroll’s legal team arguing that Trump’s statements caused significant harm to her reputation and well-being.

The Legal Arguments: A Battle of Narratives

Carroll’s Case: Seeking Justice and Accountability

Roberta Kaplan, representing Carroll, urged the jury to impose a substantial punitive damages award on Trump. She highlighted the depth of Carroll’s suffering, both emotionally and reputationally, due to Trump’s repeated public denials and derogatory remarks. Kaplan pointed to Trump’s wealth, emphasizing the need for a significant financial judgment to deter future defamation.

Trump’s Defense: Denial and Disputation

Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba, argued that the former president was merely stating his truth and should not be held responsible for the actions of social media users who threatened Carroll. Habba faced several objections from the judge for straying into prohibited areas of discussion, underlining the contentious nature of the trial.

The Impact and Implications of the Trial

Societal Perceptions and Legal Precedents

This trial is not just about the personal legal battle between Carroll and Trump; it symbolizes a larger societal struggle over accountability, presidential conduct, and the treatment of sexual assault allegations. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications, potentially influencing how public figures address accusations and the legal ramifications of their statements.

Former President Donald Trump
Image provided by Frenz Hub

Carroll’s Quest for Damages

Compensatory and Punitive Damages

Carroll is seeking at least $10 million in compensatory damages for harm to her reputation and emotional distress. Additionally, her team is advocating for punitive damages as a deterrent against future defamatory actions by Trump. The amount of these damages, yet to be determined, could set a precedent for similar cases in the future.

The Jury’s Role and Decision

The jury faces the complex task of sifting through emotional testimonies, legal intricacies, and societal implications to arrive at a just decision. Their verdict will not only determine the compensation owed to Carroll but also reflect on the broader issues of defamation and accountability for public figures.


  • Olu Ojo

    My name is Olu. I am a passionate entrepreneur who loves to write about Pets, Home Improvement Hacks & Products, Fitness, and Travel Lifestyle. I have two bachelor's degrees in Veterinary Medicine and Applied Accounting with a CPA designation. I currently shuffle time between completing a Master of Business Administration Degree Education, Professional Practice, and Content writing. I have freelanced lifestyle content and posts for many top authority websites like MSN, and Wealth of Geeks.

Spread the love

Leave a Comment

Frenz Lifestyle & Wellness Blog

For Lifestyle trends, tips, and best product reviews

Join Our Subscriber List Today!

This will close in 0 seconds